The Relevance of Progressive Law to Legal Reasoning in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ismawati Septiningsih Law Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v1i2.16

Keywords:

progressive law, substantive justice, reconstruction

Abstract

Legal rules and law enforcement in Indonesia are heavily influenced by the legal system inherited from the Dutch colonial era. Many of the colonial regulations are still in effect today, even though they are no longer appropriate to the conditions of Indonesian society. The aim of writing this article is to analyze the contribution of progressive law to legal reasoning in Indonesia. This article was written using a type of normative research with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that Dutch inherited law, which is based on positivist thinking, is often rigid and procedural. So there is less attention to aspects of substantive justice. It is hoped that the presence of progressive law will be able to reconstruct legislative regulations in Indonesia so that they realize substantive justice and not just procedural justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M. (2023). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Melahirkan Putusan Progresif. Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v17i1.1853

Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185

Busthami, D. (2018). KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.336-342

Halim, C., & Patria Setyawan, V. (2024). The Importance of Law Enforcement Based on Progressive Law in Realizing Community Welfare. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8987–8991. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3

Hertoni, M. (2016). Independensi Hakim Dalam Mencari Kebenaran Materiil. Lex Crimen, 5(1).

Isnantiana, N. I. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. ISLAMADINA, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920

Kompas. (2020, January 18). Sederet Lansia yang Harus Menjalani Pidana Penjara. Https://Www.Kompas.Com/Tren/Read/2020/01/18/213315465/Selain-Kakek-Samirin-Ini-4-Kasus-Hukum-Yang-Sempat-Menimpa-Lansia?Page=all#google_vignette.

Maruf, S. A., & Harefa, S. (2023). PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v2i2.140

Muhammad Rustamaji. (2017). Pilar-Pilar Hukum Progresif: Menyelami Pemikiran Satjipto Rahardjo. Thafa Media.

Mukhidin. (2014). Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum yang Mensejahterahkan Rakyat. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(3).

Patria, V., & Kurniawan, I. dwi. (2022). CORRELATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHILOSOPHY OF PANCASILA IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL SYSTEM. Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.33061/jgz.v11i2.7676

Rhiti, H. (2016). LANDASAN FILOSOFIS HUKUM PROGRESIF. Justitia et Pax, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v32i1.760

Rhiti, H., & Setyawan, V. P. (2023). The Role of Legal Philosophy in Forming the Rule of Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1). https://kumparan.com/febylestari026/peranan-filsafat-hukum-terhadap-hukumdi-indonesia-1uqrXdrs6Er/full,

Salam, S. (2015). Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial (Kajian Sosiologi Hukum). Tahkim, 11(1).

Setyawan, V. P., & Rhiti, H. (2022). RELASI ASAS LEGALITAS HUKUM PIDANA DAN PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ALAM. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(12).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

Septiningsih, I. . (2024). The Relevance of Progressive Law to Legal Reasoning in Indonesia. LAW&PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v1i2.16

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories