Obedience to Constitutional Court Decisions: Constitutional Obligations and Moral Obligations of Legislators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12641736Keywords:
constitutional court, constitutional obligation, constitution disobedience, moral.Abstract
It is stated in the constitution that the Constitutional Court is the court of first and last instance whose decision is final. Problems arise when the Constitutional Court's decision requires follow-up to make it happen and other institutions follow up on it. This research is normative research that examines compliance with the Constitutional Court's decision as a constitutional obligation to legislate and a moral obligation to legislate using a conceptual approach. The results of this research show that non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's decision is a form of disloyalty and defiance of the constitution itself or what is referred to as constitutional disobedience. In addition, with the consideration that the Constitutional Court is a negative legislature, there are no special enforcement agencies, and there are no juridical consequences for ignoring the Constitutional Court's decision. Thus, the application of Lawrence Kohlberg's 4 moral orientations must be put forward as fulfilling moral obligations. This research concluded that obedience to the Constitutional Court decisions is not only a constitutional obligation for legislators but also a moral obligation for legislators.
Downloads
References
Aprita, S., & Adhitya, R. (2020). Filsafat Hukum (Pertama). Rajawali Pers. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Basri, S. (2019). Demokrasi Rousseau. January 2019, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11370.03524
Indrayana, D., & Mochtar, Z. A. (2007). Komparasi Sifat Mengikat Putusan Judicial Review MK dan PTUN. Mimbar Hukum, 19(3), 335–485. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/viewFile/19074/12339
M. Nggilu, N. (2019). Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2021). Salinan Putusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. 1–448.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi). Kencana.
Maulidi, M. A. (2017). Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(4), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art2
MR. (2022). Ketidakpatuhan Pemerintah Terhadap Putusan MK Terkait UU Cipta Kerja. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ketidakpatuhan-pemerintah-terhadap-putusan-mk-terkait-uu-cipta-kerja-lt6251292956325
ND, M. F., & Achmad Yulianto. (2007). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Piter, R., & Saeng, V. (2021). Konsep Kebebasan Menurut Jean-Jacques Rousseau dan Relevansinya Bagi Demokrasi Indonesia Saat Ini (Sebuah Kajian Filosofis - Kritis). Forum Filsafat Dan Teologi, 50(1), 15–33.
Prang, A. J. (2011). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 77–94.
Robuwan, R. (2018). Redistribusi Kekuasaan Negara Dan Hubungan Antar Lembaga Negara Di Indonesia. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 2056–2082. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v12i1.957
Rofiannas, R. (2017). Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Analisis Konstitusionalitas Sema No. 7 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 1(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol1.no1.p19-36
Rusydi, M. (2021). Hukum Dan Moral: Mengulik Ulang Perdebatan Positivisme Hukum Dan Teori Hukum Kodrat H.L.a Hart & Lon F. Fuller. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i1.134
Sujatnika, G. (2023). PERPPU Cipta Kerja Kado Akhir Tahun Yang Tak Diinginkan. Law.Ui.Ac.Id. aw.ui.ac.id/perppu-cipta-kerja-kado-akhir-tahun-yang-tak-diinginkan-oleh-ghunarsa-sujatnika/
Suryana, W., & Raharjo, A. (2023). Bivitri: Perppu Cipta Kerja Bentuk Keculasan Pemerintah. Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/ro0dsy436/bivitri-perppu-cipta-kerja-bentuk-keculasan-pemerintah
Triningsih, A., Subiyanto, A. E., & Nurhayani, N. (2022). Kesadaran Berkonstitusi bagi Penegak Hukum terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Menjaga Kewibawaan Peradilan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(4), 898. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1848
Wardhana, A. F. G. (2023). Dosen UII Berikan Pandangan Mengenai Perppu Cipta Kerja. https://www.uii.ac.id/dosen-uii-berikan-pandangan-mengenai-perppu-cipta-kerja/
Widiarto, A. E. (2016). Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 735. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1244
Wijaya, D. N. (2016). Jean-Jaques Rousseau dalam Demokrasi. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9075
Wijayanti, W., & Pasaribu, A. (2020). Konstitusionalitas Perkawinan Antar-Pegawai Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(3), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1738
Wulandari, C. (2020). Kedudukan Moralitas Dalam Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.1-14
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mujiyana, Windy Virdinia Putri, Gumilang Fuadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
