KPK Authority to Investigate, Prosecute, and Prosecute Corruption Offences Connexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v1i6.61Keywords:
KPK Authority, Corruption Crime, KPKAbstract
The unclear legal arrangements in Chapter XI of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), particularly Article 89 to Article 94, have created legal uncertainty for the KPK in carrying out the functions of investigation and prosecution of koneksitas cases. This has resulted in weak coordination between the KPK and military institutions, which has an impact on suboptimal case handling and potential violations of the principle of justice. This research uses normative legal methods with regulatory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The results showed that Article 89 of KUHAP gives priority to the General Court in processing koneksitas cases, but does not explicitly regulate the KPK's authority. This lack of clarity has made it difficult for the KPK to form a joint team with the Military Oditur as stipulated in Article 89 paragraph (2) of KUHAP. This lack of legal certainty is a major obstacle in the effort to enforce a just and effective law.
Downloads
References
Budi Setiawan, J. (2019). KPK's Authority in Investigating and Prosecuting Koneksitas Crimes: A Criminal Law Perspective. De Jure Journal of Legal Research, 167-184.
Effendi, R. (2021). Challenges of Corruption Law Enforcement in Indonesia: A Case Study of the Handling of Koneksitas Cases by the KPK. Journal of Law & Legislation Science, 125-140.
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. (2020). KPK's Authority in Investigating and Prosecuting Koneksitas Crimes: A Constitutional Law Perspective. Novelty Law Journal, 126-139.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2019). The Development of Indonesian Constitutional Law after Reform. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. (2019). The Science of Indonesian Law. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Library.
Muladi, A. (2020). The Complexity of Handling Connectivity Cases in Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Nasution, A. M. (2019). KPK Supervision in Handling Koneksitas Cases. Journal of Criminal Law and Law Enforcement, 10 (1), 12-17.
Prasetyo, D. (2019). KPK's Authority in Handling Koneksitas Cases: A Review of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. Journal of Legal Dynamics, 314-328.
Susanto, B. (2020). The Role of the KPK in Handling Connectivity Cases: A Case Study of Corruption Cases Involving Military Officials. Journal of Legal Studies, 345-362.
Sudarsono, M. T. (2020). KPK's Authority in Handling Koneksitas Cases: A KUHAP Perspective. Journal of Law and Justice, 15 (2), 207-217.
Suryanto, A. (2022). Political Interference in Anti-Corruption Efforts: Lessons From Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17 (2), 34-40.
Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Pamudji. (2011). Normative Legal Research. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Soehino. (2019). Corruption: Theories of Causes, Prevention and Enforcement. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Transparency International (2023). Corruption and Accountability in Developing Countries. Transparency International.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Riski Yuliansyah, Dahlan, M. Jafar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.