Between Order and Disorder: Legal Authority and Social Legitimacy in Transitional Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v3i1.116Keywords:
Transitional Governance, Legal Authority, Social Legitimacy, Hybrid Governance, Rule of LawAbstract
This article examines the relationship between legal authority and social legitimacy in transitional governance. Transitional societies often experience institutional fragility in which constitutional legality alone is insufficient to maintain political stability and public trust. Using a qualitative normative approach, this study analyzes how governance authority is negotiated between formal state institutions and socially embedded actors within contexts of political transition, post-conflict reconstruction, and institutional uncertainty. The findings indicate that legal authority frequently weakens when disconnected from social legitimacy, while informal governance structures may gain stronger societal recognition despite lacking formal constitutional status. The study introduces the concept of “legitimacy-fluid governance,” referring to the dynamic shift of authority between formal and informal institutions depending on political performance, public trust, and social acceptance. The article argues that sustainable transitional governance requires balancing institutional legality with inclusive participation and socially grounded legitimacy. This study contributes to governance and socio-legal scholarship by offering an interdisciplinary framework for understanding governance between order and disorder in contemporary transitional societies.
Downloads
References
Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3
Bell, C. (2008). On the law of peace: Peace agreements and the lex pacificatoria. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226833.001.0001
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2021). From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1858935
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2019). State fragility and governance: Conflict mitigation and subnational perspectives. Development Policy Review, 37(S1), O5–O23. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12393
Call, C. T. (2012). Why peace fails: The causes and prevention of civil war recurrence. Georgetown University Press.
Chandler, D. (2019). Peacebuilding: The twenty years’ crisis, 1997–2017. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22038-9
Chesterman, S. (2021). Transitional administration, state-building, and the rule of law. International Peacekeeping, 28(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2021.1887534
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
de Waal, A. (2015). The real politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, war and the business of power. Polity Press.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2017). Rethinking civil society and transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw027
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2020). The lure of technocracy. Polity Press.
Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2017). Governing borderless threats: Non-traditional security and the politics of state transformation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316338385
Heupel, M., & Zürn, M. (2017). Protecting the individual from international authority. International Organization, 71(4), 809–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000192
Krasner, S. D., & Risse, T. (2014). External actors, state-building, and service provision in areas of limited statehood. Governance, 27(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12065
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307033
Mampilly, Z. C. (2015). Rebel rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801455675
Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613204
Moe, L. W., & Simojoki, M. V. (2018). Custom, contestation and cooperation: Peacebuilding in Somalia. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2018.1495101
OECD. (2020). States of fragility 2020. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ba7c22e7-en
Paris, R. (2014). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280367
Pospisil, J. (2019). Peace in political unsettlement: Beyond solving conflict. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0271-9
Risse, T. (2018). Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/riss18242
Scharpf, F. W. (2018). Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. European Political Science Review, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000043
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Wiener, A. (2018). Contestation and constitution of norms in global international relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316718774
Zaum, D. (2013). Can external actors build the state?. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203103730
Zürcher, C. (2017). Fragile states and conflict management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186086
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Richard Kwadzo Doe-Dartey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant all permissions required for your intended use. Other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may apply.
