The Role of Court Excellence in Facilitating Expedited Trials to Enhance Legal Efficiency in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v2i4.43Keywords:
expedited trial, court excellence, judicial efficiencyAbstract
This scholarly article investigates the implementation of court excellence frameworks as a mechanism for expediting trials, thereby improving legal efficiency within Indonesia's judicial landscape. The Indonesian justice system confronts considerable challenges in delivering timely justice, largely attributed to case backlogs and procedural inefficiencies. Court excellence principles are examined here as a strategic approach to streamline judicial processes, boost institutional efficiency, and accelerate case resolutions. Through an analysis of Indonesia’s legal structures and current practices, this paper underscores the critical role of court excellence principles in fostering a justice system that is both equitable and efficient. Key insights and strategic recommendations are provided to support the effective implementation of expedited trials, ultimately promoting legal expediency in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
American Bar Association. (2006). Speedy Trial and Timely Resolution of Criminal Cases. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
Betterman v. Montana, 136 S. Ct. 1609 (2016).
Bloate v. United States, 559 U.S. 196 (2010).
Dalton, T., & Singer, J. M. (2014). Bigger isn’t always better: An analysis of court efficiency using hierarchical linear modeling. Pace Law Review, 34(3), 1170.
Hartanto, H., et al. (2021). The implementation of simple, expeditious, and inexpensive principle for quality private court decision through e-court. ICEEP 2021 Proceedings, 22.
Ostrom, B. (2010). Achieving High Performance: A Framework for Courts. Virginia: National Center for State Courts.
Ostrom, B., & Hanson, R. A. (2000). Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective from Nine State Criminal Trial Courts. Nevada: U.S. Department of Justice.
Peyrache, A., & Zago, A. (2024). The inefficiency of courts of justice: Industry structure, capacity, and misallocation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 62, 217-238.
The World Bank. (1999). Reducing Court Delays: Five Lessons from the United States. Geneva: Prem Notes 1999.
UNDP. (2019). Judicial Integrity Champions. Jakarta: UNDP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Edward T.H. Simarmata, Tubagus Achmad Darodjat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant all permissions required for your intended use. Other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may apply.
