Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Equal Education: A Legal Framework for Algorithmic Educational Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v3i3.124Keywords:
algorithmic educational justice, artificial intelligence, right to education, equality, education law, algorithmic discrimination, student dataAbstract
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in education is reshaping how learners access knowledge, receive instruction, are assessed, and are classified by educational institutions. Although AI can expand personalization, accessibility, and educational efficiency, its deployment may also generate new forms of inequality through unequal access to advanced technologies, algorithmic bias, opaque profiling, data-intensive surveillance, and differential quality of AI-mediated learning. This article examines whether the traditional legal conception of the right to equal education remains adequate in an increasingly algorithmic educational environment. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, doctrinal, and comparative approaches. It examines international human-rights standards, contemporary AI governance frameworks, education law, and emerging national approaches to AI in education. The analysis argues that formal equality is insufficient where algorithmic systems distribute educational opportunities differently according to data, infrastructure, digital competence, socioeconomic status, or model performance. The article develops the concept of Algorithmic Educational Justice and proposes a seven-dimensional framework encompassing equal access, algorithmic non-discrimination, educational autonomy, data dignity, explainable education, institutional accountability, and effective remedy. The article concludes that AI should be governed as an educational justice issue rather than merely as a technological innovation. The right to equal education must extend to the conditions under which algorithmic systems allocate educational opportunities, and states must ensure that technological transformation does not convert existing educational inequalities into durable algorithmic inequalities.
References
Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity Press.
Butler, O. (2025). Algorithmic decision-making, delegation and the modern machinery of government. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(3), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf018
Council of Europe. (2024). Framework convention on artificial intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe.
Covilla, J. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence and administrative discretion: Exploring adaptations and boundaries. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(Special Issue 1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.76
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kizilcec, R. F., Saltarelli, A., Reich, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Science, 355(6322), 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3582
Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705.
Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people's rights in the digital age. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
OECD. (2023). Digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
OECD. (2024). OECD AI principles. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Roehl, U. B. U. (2024). Automated, administrative decision-making and good governance: Synergies, trade-offs, and limits. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13799
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2025). AI and education: Protecting the rights of learners. UNESCO.
UNICEF. (2021). Policy guidance on AI for children. UNICEF.
UNICEF. (2024). Guidance on AI and children: Version 3.0. UNICEF.
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations Treaty Series, 993, 3.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations Treaty Series, 1577, 3.
Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
World Bank. (2020). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone, everywhere. World Bank.
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sally Awad Elsakka, Nasr Al-Sayed Rashid, Hassan H. Ghofair
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant all permissions required for your intended use. Other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may apply.
