Beyond Compliance: Legal Capability as a Dynamic Strategic Resource for Sustainable Competitive Advantage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v3i3.125Keywords:
strategic management, strategic legal capability, legal astuteness, dynamic capabilities, legal strategy, regulatory strategy, competitive advantage, strategic adaptation, corporate governanceAbstract
Organizations increasingly operate in environments where regulatory change, technological disruption, and institutional uncertainty directly affect the feasibility and timing of strategic decisions. Yet law is still frequently treated as a compliance boundary rather than as a strategic capability. This article develops Strategic Legal Capability (SLC) as a higher-order organizational capability through which firms sense, interpret, orchestrate, and convert legal and regulatory change into strategic adaptation and sustainable competitive advantage. An integrative literature review combines insights from the resource-based view, dynamic capabilities theory, institutional theory, legal astuteness, legal strategy, and nonmarket strategy. The synthesis identifies four mutually reinforcing dimensions of SLC: legal sensing, legal interpretation, legal orchestration, and regulatory opportunity conversion. The article proposes that SLC improves strategic decision quality and organizational resilience by expanding the firm's feasible strategic options under regulatory uncertainty. It further argues that regulatory complexity, technological disruption, institutional uncertainty, and artificial-intelligence intensity condition the value of SLC. The resulting framework reframes law from an exogenous constraint into an endogenous capability for strategic adaptation. The article contributes a unified construct, a set of testable propositions, and a research agenda for integrating law more deeply into contemporary strategic management.
References
Bagley, C. E. (2008). Winning legally: The value of legal astuteness. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193254
Bagley, C. E. (2010). What's law got to do with it?: Integrating law and strategy. American Business Law Journal, 47(4), 587–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2010.01105.x
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165788
Bird, R. C., & Evans, J. W. (2024). What is the impact of legal strategy? American Business Law Journal, 61(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12241
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Masson, A., & Bouthinon-Dumas, H. (Eds.). (2026). The Oxford handbook of law and management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.001.0001
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anwar, Romansyah Sahabuddin, Chalid Imran Musa, Deddy Ibrahim Rauf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant all permissions required for your intended use. Other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may apply.
