From Patient Voice to Institutional Accountability: A Rights-Based Framework for Dignity-Centred Governance in Public Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v3i4.136Keywords:
patient voice, institutional accountability, patient rights, human dignity, public healthcare governance, institutional responsiveness, complaint handlingAbstract
Public healthcare institutions routinely invite patients to report their experiences, raise concerns and participate in decisions. Yet the presence of feedback channels does not establish that an institution has listened, recognised the rights at stake or accepted responsibility for an adequate response. Recent research has examined patient and public involvement, the organisational conditions that support patient voice, complaint-based learning and the use of patient-experience data. These developments make the question of institutional accountability more—not less—pressing. This article develops a rights-based conceptual framework for understanding how patient voice can become an institutional claim to explanation, review and appropriate remedy. Drawing on a critical integrative synthesis of scholarship in health services research, public administration and human rights, it proposes the Patient Voice-to-Accountability Framework (PVAF). The framework distinguishes five connected institutional functions: accessible voice, rights-based interpretation, reasoned response, review and remedy, and governance-level learning and answerability. Inclusion, procedural fairness and protection against retaliation operate across the framework. The article’s contribution is not the invention of patient participation or complaint-learning concepts; it is the specification of the normative and administrative links that should connect a patient’s account to an institution’s duty to explain, correct and learn. The PVAF is a conceptual proposition, not an empirically validated model. Its value and limits require testing across different legal systems, healthcare settings and patient groups.
References
Akulov, Z., Berikkhanov, Z., Sukhanova, M., Niskova, V., Tarabrin, E., Nikolaev, A., Razumovsky, V., Shestakov, A., Kotelnikov, A., Ivanova, M., & Nourmahal, S. (2026). From patient voice to organizational adaptability: A critical narrative review and conceptual model for personalized care. Healthcare, 14(18), 3064. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14183064
Arage, S. M., Woldie, M., Kebede, A., Yazachew, L., & Atnafu, A. (2026). Organisational responses to patient complaints in healthcare service delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. BMJ Open Quality, 15(3), e004070. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004070
Bergholtz, J., Wolf, A., Crine, V., Cleeve, H., Santana, M.-J., & Björkman, I. (2024). Patient and public involvement in healthcare: A systematic mapping review of systematic reviews—Identification of current research and possible directions for future research. BMJ Open, 14(9), e083215. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083215
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2004). Accountability and health systems: Toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy and Planning, 19(6), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh052
Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs, 32(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
Cohen, J., & Ezer, T. (2013). Human rights in patient care: A theoretical and practical framework. Health and Human Rights, 15(2), 7–19.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2000). General comment No. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health (Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). United Nations. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/2000/en/36991
Cordeaux, E., Amsdr, I., Bartsch, A., Easton, J., Andiappan, M., Gotlib Conn, L., & Kuluski, K. (2025). Facilitating patient and caregiver voicing in hospital settings: A narrative synthesis of the literature and conceptual framework. SSM—Health Systems, 5, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100116
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
Dutra, P. E. P., Quagliato, L. A., & Nardi, A. E. (2022). Improving the perception of respect for and the dignity of inpatients: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(5), e059129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059129
Déom, N., Welch, J., & Vindrola-Padros, C. (2026). Patient and family activated escalation systems: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 38(3), mzag093. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag093
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, E., Tomson, D., Dodd, C., Rollnick, S., Edwards, A., & Barry, M. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1996). What is accountability in health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 124(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-2-199601150-00007
Epstein, R. M., Franks, P., Fiscella, K., Shields, C. G., Meldrum, S. C., Kravitz, R. L., & Duberstein, P. R. (2005). Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), 1516–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001
Fredriksson, M., Sampaio, F., & Moberg, L. (2025). The impact of patient and public involvement in healthcare services: A conceptual review spanning social sciences and health sciences. SSM—Qualitative Research in Health, 7, 100517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100517
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10027
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., English, M., García-Elorrio, E., Guanais, F., Gureje, O., Hirschhorn, L. R., Jiang, L., Kelley, E., Lemango, E. T., Liljestrand, J., . . . Pate, M. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), e1196–e1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
Levesque, J.-F., Harris, M. F., & Russell, G. (2013). Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18
Martin, G. P., Chew, S., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2021). Why do systems for responding to concerns and complaints so often fail patients, families and healthcare staff? A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114375
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 51(7), 1087–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8
Ocloo, J., & Matthews, R. (2016). From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(8), 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839
OECD. (2021). Health for the people, by the people: Building people-centred health systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c259e79a-en
Pripkó, J., & Pusztafalvi, H. (2026). Reframing patient complaints as a quality and governance function in healthcare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 38(2), mzag073. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag073
Reader, T. W. (2026). Learning from healthcare complaints: Challenges and opportunities. BMJ Quality & Safety, 35(2), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019081
Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2014). Patient complaints in healthcare systems: A systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(8), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437
Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2020). Learning from complaints in healthcare: A realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(8), 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009412
Santana, M. J., Manalili, K., Jolley, R. J., Zelinsky, S., Quan, H., & Lu, M. (2018). How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expectations, 21(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640
Scholl, I., Zill, J. M., Härter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2014). An integrative model of patient-centeredness—A systematic review and concept analysis. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e107828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107828
Sekalala, S., Masud, H., & Bosco, R. T. (2020). Human rights mechanisms for anti-corruption, transparency and accountability: Enabling the right to health. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1699343. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1699343
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Staniszewska, S., Boardman, F., Gunn, L., Roberts, J., Clay, D., Seers, K., Brett, J., Avital, L., Bullock, I., & O’Flynn, N. (2014). The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: Patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu003
Street, R. L., Jr., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
Teymourifar, A. (2026). Defining an integrative multidimensional framework for patient complaint management systems. Frontiers in Health Services, 6, 1767605. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1767605
Tritter, J. Q. (2009). Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations, 12(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
Vanneste, A., Wens, I., Sinnaeve, P., Adriaenssens, T., & Huys, I. (2026). Advancing the systematic implementation of patient experience data in healthcare decision-making: Multi-stakeholder insights on barriers, opportunities and policy ways forward. Health Research Policy and Systems, 24, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01438-1
World Health Organization. (2016). Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2023). Human rights and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mary C. R. Wilson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant all permissions required for your intended use. Other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may apply.
